Review
Pre-operative risk scores for the prediction of outcome in elderly people who require emergency surgery
-
* Corresponding author: Thomas E Rix tomrix@msn.com
1 Department of General Surgery, Eastbourne District General Hospital, Eastbourne, East Sussex, BN21 2UD, UK
2 Kent Institute of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, CT2 7PD, UK
World Journal of Emergency Surgery 2007, 2:16 doi:10.1186/1749-7922-2-16
Published: 5 June 2007Abstract
Background
The decision on whether to operate on a sick elderly person with an intra-abdominal emergency is one of the most difficult in general surgery. A predictive risk-score would be of great value in this situation.
Methods
A Medline search was performed to identify those predictive risk-scores relevant to sick elderly patients in whom emergency surgery might be life-saving.
Results
Many of the risk scores for surgical patients include the operative findings or require tests which are not available in the acute situation. Most of the relevant studies include younger patients and elective surgery. The Glasgow Aneurysm Score and Hardman Index are specific to ruptured aortic aneurysm while the Boey Score and the Hacetteppe Score are specific to perforated peptic ulcer. The Reiss Index and Fitness Score can be used pre-operatively if the elements of the score can be completed in time. The ASA score, which includes a significant element of subjective clinical judgement, can be augmented with factors such as age and urgency of surgery but no test has a negative predictive value sufficient to recommend against surgical intervention without clinical input.
Conclusion
Risk scores may be helpful in sick elderly patients needing emergency abdominal surgery but an experienced clinical opinion is still essential.